Murphy\’s Bye-Laws

Law #4: Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it. –H.D. Thoreau

Come Heller or High Water

Posted by PintofStout on June 25, 2008

The long-running campaign to disarm the peons populous may come to a head tomorrow when the Obscene Supreme Court issues its ruling in the case of DC v. Heller.  Disarmament is a hot issue that was enlivened by reports of gun confiscation in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, and if it is decided, against any historical evidence and in complete incongruity with the rest of the Bill of Rights – that this is the one collective right in the BoR – then disarmament will be a hot issue once again.  No matter how illogical the gun control crowd’s arguments, they may have the illogical weight of the nation’s highest court to justify any actions following a collective rights ruling in this case.

For some reason and against observational evidence of the mainstream to the contrary, rugged individualism is still seen as a defining characteristic of “Americans.”  Perhaps this was true of the people who threw off colonization and picked a fight with a proverbial giant, but is it still true of people who whimper for a bailout at the first negative consequence of their own actions?  Our society has been moving away from individualism for many, many decades now – to its own detriment, in my opinion.  The very term “American” and a million other vast generalizations of the people living under the thumb of this government are necessary for such wide-reaching rule because the bureaucracy of bureaucracies that are the different levels of government cannot rule the millions of individuals; they can only rule generalizations.  The institutions of government have always known and believed this to be true.  When the individuals started buying into the idea of collectivization, that’s when the trouble started.

The creation of the concept of collective rights – indeed the creation of involuntary collectives themselves – may well be sanctioned by the Court’s decision tomorrow.  Of course, rugged individualist don’t put much merit into the decisions of high courts and other dictates of “authority.”  An unfavorable decision may just make the rugged have to get more rugged as the terrain dictates.


2 Responses to “Come Heller or High Water”

  1. thesofine said

    Man, why is it that the people who who misinterpret the 1st amendment when it comes to religion (liberals) are the same people whittling away at the second amendment? Maybe liberals should be known as anti-individual or anti-right (excuse the pun). You’ll find that most of liberal ideals attack clearly defined constitutional rights (gun-ownership and free speech) while they fight rigorously for individual rights that are definitely not clearly delineated (ie, pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage). Maybe this is why Ron Paul ran as a Republican and not as a Democrat?

    Now, I don’t mean to badger one thieving political party more than the other, but conservative interpretation of the constitution leads to preservation of individual rights. I think this is because the writers were fervent individualists.

  2. prometheus said

    Montanans have made their stand on this clear. 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: